Research & Studies

Academic papers and peer-reviewed research I cite in my writing about AI, education, and cognitive science.

🎓 2025

Rethinking Educational Assessment in the Age of Artificial Intelligence: Insights From Recent Training Workshops

Zuheir Khlaif

AI Summary

As generative AI makes traditional assessments increasingly vulnerable to automation, educators need new frameworks for evaluating student learning. This paper draws on workshops with 300+ educators across the Global South to propose practical strategies for AI-era assessment design.

🎓 2025

The Impact of Generative AI on Critical Thinking: Self-Reported Reductions in Cognitive Effort and Confidence Effects From a Survey of Knowledge Workers

Hao-Ping (Hank) Lee, Advait Sarkar, Lev Tankelevitch, Ian Drosos, Sean Rintel, Richard Banks, Nicholas Wilson

AI Summary

From Carnegie Mellon University and Microsoft Research, this is one of the first large-scale studies examining how generative AI affects critical thinking in real workplace settings. The central finding — that trusting AI more leads to thinking less — has profound implications for knowledge work and education alike.

🎓 2024

Generative AI Can Harm Learning

Hamsa Bastani, Osbert Bastani, Alp Sungu, Haosen Ge, Özge Kabakcı, Rei Mariman

AI Summary

This is one of the first rigorous field experiments demonstrating that generative AI access can actively harm learning outcomes. The finding that students perform *worse* after losing AI access than students who never had it suggests a dependency effect with serious implications for education policy.

🎓 2024

Are We Inventing Ourselves Out of Our Own Usefulness? Striking a Balance Between Creativity and AI

Noel Carroll

AI Summary

Published in AI & Society’s “Curmudgeon Corner,” this essay cuts through the hype cycle around generative AI to ask a fundamental question: when AI can produce text, images, and music in seconds, what happens to the human creative journey that has driven civilization?

🎓 2024

AI Meets the Classroom: When Do Large Language Models Harm Learning?

Matthias Lehmann, Philipp B. Cornelius, Fabian J. Sting

AI Summary

While the debate around AI in education often focuses on whether AI helps or harms, this study reveals a more nuanced picture: *how* students use AI matters more than *whether* they use it. The distinction between substitution and complementary use has direct implications for how educators should structure AI-assisted learning.

8 studies referenced